In 2002, EBAY purchased a small, then recent IPO for 1.5 billion dollars, a high price for a company making a fraction of that. More than 10 years later, the investment in PayPal was clearly a good one. Co-founder Peter Thiel was a big part of that transaction happening.
Peter Thiel is an interesting guy. He's on my radar because of his involvement in disseminating Rene Girard's work, whom, as I have written previously, may have the great, orignal contribution to Religion in the 20th century.
Thiel met Girard at Stanford, from where he obtained his law degree from. Amongst Thiel's accomplishments was his $500,000 early investment in Facebook, which gave his VC a 10% stake-- that is worth billions now. He also is a big supporter of biomedical science, and provides grants for ideas that, believe me, won't normally get funded by national institutions.
Thiel also is openly gay. a through-and-through libertarian, and a Christian. Not a combination that is too prevalent in the human population.
Thiel is clearly a fascinating and brilliant guy. And for me, I am quite excited he is involved with Girard. As I am going through "I see Satan fall like lightning", it is encouraging to know that a guy with the resources, worldview and intelligence like Thiel will be around to help spread the Girardian viewpoint.
Thursday, December 19, 2013
Sunday, November 10, 2013
We need more Gene Robinsons, embracing of homosexuals
"For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence [sic] of their error which was meet." Romans 1:26-27
"Your mother recognizes all you're desperate displays
And she watches as her babies drift violently away
'Til they see themselves in telescopes
Do you see yourself in me?
We're such crazy babies, little monkey
We're so fu**ed up, you and me" - Adam Duritz, Counting Crows
Upon these penned words stands what many Scripture-studying Christians have, for right or wrong, depicted homosexuality to be.
There have been many interpretations for Paul's words, however, it is fair to say that historically the majority of Christians have interpreted these words as an indictment against homosexual relationships as we know them today.
Absence of Jesus' condemnation on a subject is not a good argument, but it should be at least part of the thought-process. My thoughts are this: Jesus spent His time embracing the marginalized and condemning the religious. When we combine those things with the entire theme of Scriptures when understood rightly, Jesus as Redeemer of all people, all people in need of redemption (or Paul, "all people are the same', c.f. Adam Duritz above), it is frankly difficult to attribute the bigotry Christians have shamefully displayed towards homosexuals to anything but natural Darwinian anxiety masquerading as Scriptural instruction. Or, at the very least, condemning attitudes towards homosexuality masquerading as Scriptural attitudes.
Perhaps if Christians spent more energy learning from the homosexual community, it would be better served time. Homosexuals probably represent roughly 5% of the human population; yet is there a more powerful lobbying group in America? Yet Christians represent the majority of Americans, and we know how that lobbying is going. Instead, Evangelical Christians in Washington spend their time lobbying against the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, so that the other 40 states or so can continue to allow employers to fire employees for their sexual gender (Yeah, that really can still happen). Furthermore, homosexuals are, as they should be, an integral part of the Christian community. In 2013, with all the tools we have to understand Scripture in its proper context, isn't it time to embrace our brothers and sisters instead of fearful Darwinian behavior ruling the day? While Scripture may very well have negative things to say about at least some homosexual behavior, it also does for some heterosexual behavior. Perhaps our energy is better served getting it right on our end, instead of projecting our failures on other communities.
One of the upshots I see here is voices like Gene Robinson are even more important than we know. If mainline Protestantism continues to shun the homosexual community, it will contribute to the Protestant community's continued depreciation in the Western world. And, in my opinion, this will be against the Will of the God we claim to cling to.
Wednesday, October 2, 2013
Nobel Laureate Hubel's death and non-Trinitarian Christianity
"Bring me a worm that can comprehend a man, and then I will show you a man that can comprehend the Triune God" John Wesley
David Hubel, Harvard Nobel Laureate and one of the greatest nueroscientists to live, died last week. Hubel made seminal contributions to the understanding of how the eye and brain talk, and how vision is processed. Hubel basically helped unravel complex networks. Nothing is more complex than the Trinity, however.
Hubel was a Universalist. Univeralists worship God with a different understanding than traditional, Nicene Creed Christians. Perhaps nothing has separated Christian thought (and Christian and Muslim thought) than what the Oneness of God means.
If Trinitarian Theology is incorrect (and it is, largely, I fear -- but The essence I believe to be very true) there is at least one enormous problem, that I see, with this sort of theology.
This would mean God created before He loved, better, had an object of love. If God is Love, as Christians claim, this to me is difficult to think through. If human purpose is relationship, this also is conflicting, and I believe to be, a grossly deficient understanding of God.
Only the One, Triune Creator can account for what we perceive as the purpose of mankind - loving relationship, with Creator and fellow created.
David Hubel, Harvard Nobel Laureate and one of the greatest nueroscientists to live, died last week. Hubel made seminal contributions to the understanding of how the eye and brain talk, and how vision is processed. Hubel basically helped unravel complex networks. Nothing is more complex than the Trinity, however.
Hubel was a Universalist. Univeralists worship God with a different understanding than traditional, Nicene Creed Christians. Perhaps nothing has separated Christian thought (and Christian and Muslim thought) than what the Oneness of God means.
If Trinitarian Theology is incorrect (and it is, largely, I fear -- but The essence I believe to be very true) there is at least one enormous problem, that I see, with this sort of theology.
This would mean God created before He loved, better, had an object of love. If God is Love, as Christians claim, this to me is difficult to think through. If human purpose is relationship, this also is conflicting, and I believe to be, a grossly deficient understanding of God.
Only the One, Triune Creator can account for what we perceive as the purpose of mankind - loving relationship, with Creator and fellow created.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)